E
Edward
New Member
Maybe a bit heavy thought stuff this, but I’ve just reviewed a book by Daniel Dorling called “Injustice; why social inequality persists”
It’s a strongly argued book in which he argues that material inequality is not a natural thing, but is deliberately brought about and maintained by powerful political and rich elites.
He also documents that the UK is rated the 4th most unequal advanced society in the world – and that ‘poorer’ but more equal societies like Denmark have higher levels of contentment and far better levels of mental health than the richer ones like the UK.
I’m still wondering about the connection in all this between individual competitive businesses and business people and the wider society businesses operate in. Are these wider issues of inequality ‘anything to do with’ business people? Or is it a case that the best that business people should aim for in their business is maximum profit regardless, and that it is for others to sort out the other implications for society?
Powerfully argued and reasoned book leaving me still pondering these things.
It’s a strongly argued book in which he argues that material inequality is not a natural thing, but is deliberately brought about and maintained by powerful political and rich elites.
He also documents that the UK is rated the 4th most unequal advanced society in the world – and that ‘poorer’ but more equal societies like Denmark have higher levels of contentment and far better levels of mental health than the richer ones like the UK.
I’m still wondering about the connection in all this between individual competitive businesses and business people and the wider society businesses operate in. Are these wider issues of inequality ‘anything to do with’ business people? Or is it a case that the best that business people should aim for in their business is maximum profit regardless, and that it is for others to sort out the other implications for society?
Powerfully argued and reasoned book leaving me still pondering these things.