Like HSAW policies, 'Investors In People' status and the like, ISO-Certification has become one of those 'Mutley Medal' things that injelitant managers lust after. Some organisations with certifiable management (
) won't engage contractors unless they have the magic bit o' paper and a nice plaque at reception. This has resulted in another one of those 'tail wags the dog' situations where having the box ticked is more important than what ticking the box ought to mean... And a resultant level of cynicism among workers who are impacted by the practice. i.e. like 'elfin safeteee' its often viewed as 'monkey tree' stuff.
To some extent that's fair - a whole industry has grown up around providing and maintaining certification. And - whilst I'd be clear I don't automatically include the O/P in this - it's often a case of 'you pays the money and they give you a hat and a balloon.
Cynical rant over with - the ISO9001 is actually quite a good framework, especially for those who are basically learning to be managers - or are faced with the prospect of designing a workflow where quality management is important. Another advantage of it is that it provides a common, translatable, set of signposts which span across different industries. This
is useful when hiring in services that may be 'foreign' to your own industry.
It's worth looking into and learning about - even if only to inspire your own thought process and direction of travel. - But it's a bit like having good health and safety practices (see ISO 18001 for more detail
) ... It's important to
actually have protocols in place that ensure you're working as safely as you can, and not putting anyone's health at avoidable risk. - Whereas there are an awful lot of managers out there who obsess more with plaque polishing and box ticking.