This is also scary at the moment...for people trying to sell....just another sign of the grinding noises from the ecomony....taking away the fear will be the only oil we need to get it going.
One in five properties in some areas of the UK has been on the market for the whole of 2008, data suggests.
BBC NEWS | Business | 'Stagnation' hits property market
But that's usually because they're unaffordable. You can only really risk paying over the odds for a house if it's the last house you'll ever buy and all you'll ever do with it is pay it off and live in it. There's one near me that came on last year at offers over £280K. A ridiculous price for what it is.
3 bedroom detached house for sale in Holmlea Station Road Kirknewton, EH27 8DG, EH27 It sat with a sold sign on it for ages; then went back on the market as obviously the people who made the offer on it can't have completed...
Now this, in
realistically affordable terms, is around a £200K-220K house... It's a house for a middle manager. NOT one for someone earning 80K a year which is what
you'd need to be earning to afford it.... And there's more to affording something than just being able, by fair means or fowl, to lay your hands on the money for it....
It was LUNACY at £280K .....At £315K!
There are other houses in this village that look like rejects from the Brookside set and are 'valued' at over £600K.... Madness; sheer madness!
Now; frankly, if you've been fool enough to pay over the odds for one of these houses and are likely to be left trapped with negative equity then that is the inevitable result paying more than the damned thing's worth. NOT a problem if you're settled and living in the place. But if you hoped to use it to 'leapfrog' you forward to the next over-priced pile then hell mend you.
You see, at the heart of this, is EXACTLY the same mechanism that lead to the Wall Street Crash. People are playing games with nominal values that
don't reflect the production of
anything. In short these values don't reflect anything that has been 'earned' or created or has any
factual worth.
What would be the effect if, tomorrow, the Bank of England were to simply double the number of notes in circulation? Would that make the country richer? Because that's pretty much what has happened with the housing market. People have been 'printing money'
into the value of their house. Trouble is the VALUE of a house is in its function, and the function hasn't changed. Therefore there is no 'worth' in the 'value' of a house....
What's worse is that the nominal value has reached the point where it's unsupportable. My best guess is that wages would need to rise by about 30% while house prices remain frozen for an equilibrium to be achieved. And that's discounting the overall inflationary effect that increase in wages would have.
'Something; has to give.... For sure the money supply needs to be freed up. But two things have to happen there. For one there needs to be a CAP on interest rates and secondly the banks should only lend against a realistic valuation of property based on realistic worth rather than a paper worth born of a market distorted by uncontrolled lending. Now; I'm, not suggesting that lending should be either expensive or hard to come by.. I think it should be freely available; even to the extent where couples are still routinely lent up to five times the main salary. But it would do no harm is that lending were capped to say nominal 1999 valuations for the given type and location of property, perhaps with a link to the mean industrial wage as a rolling multiplier.
....Of course that would take all the fun and bloated bonuses out of it for the city wizz kids...
